<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New features in Spring IDE 2.0M3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/15/new-features-in-spring-ide-20m3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/15/new-features-in-spring-ide-20m3/</link>
	<description>Spiros Tzavellas’s blog, mostly on software development and Java.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M3 feedback at Spring IDE Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/15/new-features-in-spring-ide-20m3/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>M3 feedback at Spring IDE Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/15/new-features-in-spring-ide-20m3/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] We are definitely getting too little feedback on what users think, miss or dislike about Spring IDE. Therefore it is always nice to find some feedback - being good or bad - on the web: Refactoring and string identifiers is a more valid concern, but it isn&#8217;t really an issue for me, as I&#8217;m using the latest and greatest Spring IDE in Eclipse (really awesome plugin, btw). Yeah, I&#8217;m leaning on a tool to help me with this, but so is everyone else when they lean on their IDE to refactor Java code (try refactoring a method name with notepad if you don&#8217;t believe me). # I am using the Spring IDE 2.0 milestones from the development update site and I am very satisfied with all the new features. The Spring IDE team is doing a great job (thanks guys) and I believe that the 2.0 release is going to be a huge step forward. # [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We are definitely getting too little feedback on what users think, miss or dislike about Spring IDE. Therefore it is always nice to find some feedback &#8211; being good or bad &#8211; on the web: Refactoring and string identifiers is a more valid concern, but it isn&#8217;t really an issue for me, as I&#8217;m using the latest and greatest Spring IDE in Eclipse (really awesome plugin, btw). Yeah, I&#8217;m leaning on a tool to help me with this, but so is everyone else when they lean on their IDE to refactor Java code (try refactoring a method name with notepad if you don&#8217;t believe me). # I am using the Spring IDE 2.0 milestones from the development update site and I am very satisfied with all the new features. The Spring IDE team is doing a great job (thanks guys) and I believe that the 2.0 release is going to be a huge step forward. # [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
