<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for spiros.blog()</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog</link>
	<description>Spiros Tzavellas's blog, mostly on software development and Java.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing Seam style @Logger injection with Spring by @Logger injection in springframework &#8226; Blog Archive &#8226; beyond - e blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/31/implementing-seam-style-logger-injection-with-spring/#comment-12737</link>
		<dc:creator>@Logger injection in springframework &#8226; Blog Archive &#8226; beyond - e blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/31/implementing-seam-style-logger-injection-with-spring/#comment-12737</guid>
		<description>[...] my search on google how to inject beans generated by a bean-factory, I&#8217;ve found this nice article about injecting a logger into beans.    About this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my search on google how to inject beans generated by a bean-factory, I&#8217;ve found this nice article about injecting a logger into beans.    About this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing Seam style @Logger injection with Spring by @Logger injection in springframework &#8226; Blog Archive &#8226; beyond - e blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/31/implementing-seam-style-logger-injection-with-spring/#comment-12736</link>
		<dc:creator>@Logger injection in springframework &#8226; Blog Archive &#8226; beyond - e blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/31/implementing-seam-style-logger-injection-with-spring/#comment-12736</guid>
		<description>[...] my search on google how to inject beans generated by a bean-factory, I&#8217;ve found thisnice article about injecting a logger into beans.    About this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my search on google how to inject beans generated by a bean-factory, I&#8217;ve found thisnice article about injecting a logger into beans.    About this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using java.util.Date values in Spring bean definitions by Praveen</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2006/06/11/using-javautildate-values-in-spring-bean-definitions/#comment-12575</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/?p=52#comment-12575</guid>
		<description>quick and useful tip. worked just like that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quick and useful tip. worked just like that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing Seam style @Logger injection with Spring by aappddeevv</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/31/implementing-seam-style-logger-injection-with-spring/#comment-9092</link>
		<dc:creator>aappddeevv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/03/31/implementing-seam-style-logger-injection-with-spring/#comment-9092</guid>
		<description>Great note.  If you want to, you can add a ReflectionUtils.makeAccessible() call in the post processor to make private fields accessible for the set assuming no security issues are detected.  Also, if you are using slf4j, you'll need to change the names slightly. Instead of Logger perhaps ClassLogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great note.  If you want to, you can add a ReflectionUtils.makeAccessible() call in the post processor to make private fields accessible for the set assuming no security issues are detected.  Also, if you are using slf4j, you&#8217;ll need to change the names slightly. Instead of Logger perhaps ClassLogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making Maven 2 work with JUnit 4 by spiros</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/05/16/making-maven-2-work-with-junit-4/#comment-5488</link>
		<dc:creator>spiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/05/16/making-maven-2-work-with-junit-4/#comment-5488</guid>
		<description>Surefire 2.2 does not support JUnit 4. I don't remember exactly, but I think that JUnit 4 test cases (with the @Test annotation) are ignored in 2.2.

BTW 2.3 is now final, so you don't have to use a snapshot from the snapshots repository.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surefire 2.2 does not support JUnit 4. I don&#8217;t remember exactly, but I think that JUnit 4 test cases (with the @Test annotation) are ignored in 2.2.</p>
<p>BTW 2.3 is now final, so you don&#8217;t have to use a snapshot from the snapshots repository.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making Maven 2 work with JUnit 4 by Asaf</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/05/16/making-maven-2-work-with-junit-4/#comment-5466</link>
		<dc:creator>Asaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/05/16/making-maven-2-work-with-junit-4/#comment-5466</guid>
		<description>What's the difference in behavior between 2.3 and 2.2, in respect to supporting JUnit 4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the difference in behavior between 2.3 and 2.2, in respect to supporting JUnit 4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two new C# 3.0 features that Java needs by Rafael Batiati</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2005/09/28/two-new-c-30-features-that-java-needs/#comment-5335</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Batiati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/?p=24#comment-5335</guid>
		<description>I'm a C# developer since 1.0 version and have migrated from Java to C# about 2000/2001 ...

Java has not yet a "delegate" like feature and Lambda expressions is a delegate evolution. Much work need be done ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a C# developer since 1.0 version and have migrated from Java to C# about 2000/2001 &#8230;</p>
<p>Java has not yet a &#8220;delegate&#8221; like feature and Lambda expressions is a delegate evolution. Much work need be done &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Dependency Injection in Struts2 for stateless EJBs part 2 by Piero</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/07/03/using-dependency-injection-in-struts2-for-stateless-ejbs-part-2/#comment-5314</link>
		<dc:creator>Piero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/07/03/using-dependency-injection-in-struts2-for-stateless-ejbs-part-2/#comment-5314</guid>
		<description>nice articles about using ejb3 in struts2. i did something very similar but without a dependency injection framework.

my solution does use a custom annotation and a struts2 interceptor.

you can find it here (its written in german, but the code is commented in english):
http://blog.pierosartini.de/archives/3-In-Struts2-auf-EJB3-Session-Bean-zugreifen.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice articles about using ejb3 in struts2. i did something very similar but without a dependency injection framework.</p>
<p>my solution does use a custom annotation and a struts2 interceptor.</p>
<p>you can find it here (its written in german, but the code is commented in english):<br />
<a href="http://blog.pierosartini.de/archives/3-In-Struts2-auf-EJB3-Session-Bean-zugreifen.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.pierosartini.de/archives/3-In-Struts2-auf-EJB3-Session-Bean-zugreifen.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C# Extension methods by spiros</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/06/02/c-extension-methods/#comment-5258</link>
		<dc:creator>spiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/06/02/c-extension-methods/#comment-5258</guid>
		<description>Billie,

I don't believe that extension methods add confusion because the user has to import them explicitly. Also you could have a visual indicator in your IDE. For example in &lt;a href="http://www.eclipse.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;Eclipse&lt;/a&gt; (I am a Java programmer) the static methods appear in italic fonts, so I suppose that in Visual Studio you could have a similar highlighting and because extension methods are actually static method they could also appear in italic fonts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billie,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that extension methods add confusion because the user has to import them explicitly. Also you could have a visual indicator in your IDE. For example in <a href="http://www.eclipse.org" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.eclipse.org');">Eclipse</a> (I am a Java programmer) the static methods appear in italic fonts, so I suppose that in Visual Studio you could have a similar highlighting and because extension methods are actually static method they could also appear in italic fonts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C# Extension methods by spiros</title>
		<link>http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/06/02/c-extension-methods/#comment-5256</link>
		<dc:creator>spiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tzavellas.com/techblog/2007/06/02/c-extension-methods/#comment-5256</guid>
		<description>Hi Ashok,

I agree with you that EMs can be misused and that we should try to create domain specific objects instead of just adding new methods to general purpose classes like string.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ashok,</p>
<p>I agree with you that EMs can be misused and that we should try to create domain specific objects instead of just adding new methods to general purpose classes like string.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
